No Child Left Behind Creates More Problems for Students than it does So

The No Child Left Behind tour was designed by President George W. Bush in 2001. Although this act seems to be cutting edge and has generated enormous amounts of both controversy and support, this is not the first time American genteelness has seen such an attempt to improve education. According to the U.S. department of Education, the purpose of No Child Left Behind is to improve student achievement and change the culture of Americas schools. ?The NCLB Act of 2001, the revised Elementary and Secondary Education Act, is a potent blend of innovative requirements, incentives and resources and it poses significant challenges for states? (?Education Commission of the States,? 2003). No Child Left Behind laws require that every state essential develop and implement an accountability system ?Holding schools accountable for the performance of all students is the cornerstone of the NCLB Act? (2003). There are four main principles to the new plan Greater accountability for student ac hievement, greater flexibility for states, districts and schools in the use of federal funds (more specifically Title I funds) and more choices for parents of children from disadvantaged backgrounds and an emphasis on teaching methods that have been demonstrated and proven to work. However and even still, No Child Left Behind creates more problems for students than it does solutions because of accountability laws. more than specifically, students in special education are held to the same standards that students in regular education are held to.Under the requirements for No Child Left Behind Act every school must have highly qualified teachers and must meet adequate yearly progress. Additionally, each school must report attendance, rise scores and other statistics p... ... www.NoChildLeftBehind.comPascopella, A. (2005) Technology cuts run deep. Retrieved 2005, March 11 Inside the Law.com Analyzing, Explaining and Debating NCLB.Williams, Patrick (2004, 12 January). No Child L eft Behind Legislation is a naughtiness Law. Independent Record. Retrieved February 28, 2005, from http//www.helenair. com/articles/2004/01/21/opinions/a04012104_03.txtWright, Pamela, Wright Peter (2003). No Child Left Behind. Harbor House Law Press. Retrieved February 26, 2005, from http//www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1892320126/qid=1109887307/sr=8-2/ref=pd_ka_1/102-1349734-1050505v=glance&s=books&n=507846Wycliff, Donald (2003, 2 October) Skirting the No Child Left Behind. The Chicago Tribune. Retrieved February 28, 2005 from http//www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-0310020171oct02,0,6652365.column